An AI document library built around your team's own material

Start with the documents you trust

A folder containing every past agreement is not automatically a useful reference library. Some files may be outdated, contain exceptions or belong to a different client. We identify which material should guide a draft and which should only be used for context.

The first decisions are editorial: which template is current, who owns the standard terms, and how the team will recognise a superseded version.

Give the team a shared way to review

I have set up a shared Legal Library in Claude Cowork that a client's team uses to draft and review documents against its own material. The team's legal lead makes the final review. We use a focused pilot to check how the approach fits your team and its responsibilities.

• Choose approved templates and define their purpose.
• Keep references identifiable so reviewers can check the source.
• Agree how exceptions and unanswered questions are surfaced.

Practise the handover, not just the prompt

A useful pilot follows a document from its first draft through the team's review. We check whether people can find the right starting material, spot unsupported wording and understand what still needs a decision.

The tool and access arrangement depend on the documents involved. I scope those choices with you, explain any software costs and teach the team how to maintain the library after the first setup.